> >I've been recompiling wmx and wm2 and have been surprised at how much >larger the wmx executable is: > >wm2: 130774 bytes >wmx: 669368 bytes > >The wmx source code is not, I think, 5 times larger than wm2, so where >does this difference come from? try to remove the symbol table with strip wmx Thomas
- Re: [wmx] wm2 vs wmx - why is the wmx executable so large?, (continued)
- [wmx] XK_Multi_key ?, digs
- [wmx] Shapes and stuff (GQmpeg now looks good), henri
- Re: [wmx] Shapes and stuff, Andrew Chadwick
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [wmx] Shapes and stuff (GQmpeg now looks good), cannam