Re: [wmx] wm2 vs wmx - why is the wmx executable so large?

On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, marc wrote:

> 
> > 
> > 
> > I've been recompiling wmx and wm2 and have been surprised at how much
> > larger the wmx executable is:
> > 
> > wm2: 130774 bytes
> > wmx: 669368 bytes
> > 
> > The wmx source code is not, I think, 5 times larger than wm2, so where
> > does this difference come from?
> 
> Could it be that the wmx executable also has to carry a bitmap 
> around ?

included libraries?  the bitmap loading library?


	-j

                                    ___________     
      Hey, you got weasels               /          Scott "Jerry" Lawrence
         on your face.                  /             sdlpci@cis.rit.edu
                                   \___/                www.absynth.com